Cited by 136Williams Syndrome ResearchFace Recognition and PerceptionAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perceiving Facial and Vocal Expressions of Emotion in Individuals With Williams Syndrome

Plesa-Skwerer, Daniela, Faja, Susan, Schofield, Casey, Verbalis, Alyssa, Tager-Flusberg, Helen·2006·American Journal on Mental Retardation

Abstract

People with Williams syndrome are extremely sociable, empathic, and expressive in communication. Some researchers suggest they may be especially sensitive to perceiving emotional expressions. We administered the Faces and Paralanguage subtests of the Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy Scale (DANVA2), a standardized measure of emotion recognition for basic emotions to three groups: adolescents and adults with Williams syndrome, age and IQ-matched participants with learning/intellectual disability, and age-matched nonimpaired controls. The Williams syndrome and learning/intellectual disability groups performed significantly worse than the typically developing controls on both subtests, especially on negative emotions. Error analysis indicated the same general pattern of performance across versions and subtests of the DANVA2 for all groups. These findings suggest that emotion recognition is not spared in Williams syndrome.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[15:pfaveo]2.0.co;2

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 43 references

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 136

Metadata

Authors
Plesa-Skwerer, D., Faja, S., Schofield, C., Verbalis, A., & Tager-Flusberg, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Binghamton University (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
American Journal on Mental Retardation
Published
2006
Volume
111
Issue
1
Pages
15
ISSN
0895-8017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102098790
Cited by
136
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal on Mental Retardation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
Williams syndrome, emotion recognition, facial expressions, vocal expression, paralinguistic features, learning disabilities, intellectual disability, negative emotions, error analysis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Child, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Perceptual Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Visual Perception, Williams Syndrome, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review